History stays fragmented
Similar events sit across NCRs, complaints, audits and shared folders under inconsistent language.
Build stronger investigations in less engineering time.
Retrieve similar events, expose missing evidence and prepare a source-linked investigation draft - while your authorised quality professionals retain every decision and approval.
They need the relevant history, evidence and controlled documents brought together before scarce engineering time is lost searching for them.
Similar events sit across NCRs, complaints, audits and shared folders under inconsistent language.
Preparation quality depends on experience, memory and the time available to search.
CAPAs remain open while engineers reconstruct context that already exists somewhere in the business.
CAPA Intelligence supports the preparation work around an investigation. It does not declare root cause, approve disposition or close the CAPA.
Normalise the problem description and identify the affected product, process, supplier, equipment and site.
Find similar NCRs, complaints, audit findings, previous CAPAs and controlled documents.
Create an investigation plan and show which records, checks or interviews are still required.
Draft the problem statement, containment summary and testable hypotheses with every source attached.
The named investigator edits, approves and exports the controlled output to the existing QMS.
Every pilot is designed around an agreed system of record and a named human approval point.
Relevant historical events, recurrence links and previous corrective actions with direct source references.
A structured problem statement, evidence request list and investigation plan for accountable review.
Containment and corrective-action drafting assistance clearly separated from authorised decisions.
Measured improvement against baseline, user acceptance, source lineage and the production recommendation.
One site. One CAPA or NCR workflow. One primary data source. Up to 10 users. A bounded engagement with a clear decision at the end.
Confirm scope, success measures, data access, accountable owners and approval gates.
Prepare a representative historical sample and map the primary source into a controlled evidence structure.
Configure similar-event retrieval, evidence checks, source lineage and the investigation draft workflow.
Quality users test real or representative cases while QAI measures relevance, effort and reviewer rework.
Tune the workflow, confirm governance controls and compare results with the agreed baseline.
Deliver the verified improvement report, controlled operating guide and recommendation for production use.
The pilot compares the controlled workflow with the customer's current baseline. No vague claims and no value declared without customer verification.
The agent may retrieve history, flag evidence gaps and suggest testable hypotheses. It never declares root cause, approves disposition, closes CAPA or releases product.
Begin with evidence, progress to a bounded CAPA pilot and move into managed production only when the value report supports it.
5-10 working days to map quality workload, cost, data readiness and the strongest value case.
50% credited against a pilot commissioned within 30 days.Eight weeks, one site, one CAPA/NCR workflow, one primary data source and up to 10 users.
Fixed scope. Prices exclude VAT.One site and one workflow with monitoring, support and a monthly value report.
Annual service following a successful pilot.Book a free 30-minute Quality Value Call. We will test the use case against urgency, measurable workload, available data and the governance boundary.